The Femicidal Intent of the Law

chattel (n.)
early 13c., chatel “property, goods,” from Old French chatel “chattels, goods, wealth, possessions, property; profit; cattle,” from Late Latin capitale “property” (see cattle, which is the Old North French form of the same word). Application to slaves (1640s) is a rhetorical figure of abolitionists, etc.

The whole treatment of suicidal ideation, suicidal intent and the threat of suicide with regard to abortion legislation serves to make the woman guilty: they are her ideas, her intent, her threat.

This will not be changed an iota by any legislation under proposal by the government. Such a crisis is rarely, if ever, presented in terms of what it really is: the law killing women by threatening them with a forced birth.

Why, then, do we not speak of the femicidal intent of the law?

Sir, – If a farmer suffers suicidal ideation because his livestock are starving, does anyone recommend, let alone legislate for, the destruction of his cattle? Would anyone remark, “But the animals are going to die anyway”? Surely every effort will be made to save the livestock – and thus the farmer? If I am threatening to take my own life because I can’t meet my debts, should I be entitled to have my debt “terminated”? How then does it makes sense to legislate for the destruction of the unborn based on the suicidal ideation of the mother?

– Yours, etc, Fr EAMONN McCARTHY CC, Freemount, Charleville, Co Cork.

Above, in an Irish Times letter published today, a priest compares crisis pregnancy with looking after cattle.

Then, he compares a crisis pregnancy to being in debt, with the threat of suicide appearing as a threat to the creditor, and you can’t be having that. (In so doing he ignores the fact that many people do die by their own hand because they can’t meet their debts and hence there are many excellent grounds for ‘terminating’ debt).

The plain conclusion to be drawn is that this man sees women as cattle and slaves, and that such views are acceptable in polite Irish society.

Advertisements

3 Comments

April 30, 2013 · 8:55 am

3 responses to “The Femicidal Intent of the Law

  1. I still can’t see the connection between starving cattle and forced pregnancy. Cows are not me. Nobody’s forcing me to nourish those cows with my own body. Nobody’s hooking those cows up to me for months of my life, leeching nutrients from my bones and my blood. Nobody can see by looking at me that I have starving cows. I didn’t become a Person With Cows by accident or against my will. I can sell my cows anytime I like and become a Person Without Cows. Nobody thinks I’m a moral failure if I sell cows to someone who really wants to be a farmer, or who just plain loves taking care of cows and has a bunch of lovely fields for them to live in. Nobody tells me it’s my biological destiny to have cows, that I’m somehow less of a real person if I never have any cows, or that people who live in cities without cows live impoverished, barren lives.

  2. The funny thing is, when cows suffer a pregnancy that goes wrong, farmers do not adopt a ‘wait and let nature take it’s course’ approach. They remove the unviable calf and save the cow. And in doing so, farmers show more compassion for their animals than the Catholic church shows for women.

  3. Pingback: Abortion. On demand. | Consider the Tea Cosy

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s